Marketing status

The first example of luxury goods is attributed to King Louis XIV’s finance minister, Jean-Baptiste Colbert, in the 1660s. At the time, France was falling behind in investing in its navies and was missing out on the wealth gained from expeditions to the New World. As a result, Colbert decided to double down on domestic production instead of international, creating the first market for luxury goods. Now that expensive goods were in much higher demand from the upper classes, it was only a matter of time before someone marketed these products to them. 

Josiah Wedgwood, founder of Wedgewood Company in 1759, invented what we call marketing today. Wedgewood pioneered modern techniques such as direct mail, money-back guarantees, self-service, free delivery, buy one get one free, and illustrated catalogs. Wedgewood revolutionized how to conduct business and, when he died, was one of the wealthiest people on Earth. 

As the centuries passed, marketing became a “solution” to a “problem.” If you have problems, we can fix them with a product or service. But eventually, that wasn’t enough. Corporations began to come up with new wants and new desires to sell. Think about it for a moment. It wasn’t until the 1950s that the typical teenager became a consumer category. Before that, they owned one pair of shoes, not one for every occasion. This is vastly different from today. 

When you ask the question of what brands like Apple, Nike, Patagonia, and Harley Davidson, it is this: People like us buy products like this. Changing outsiders into insiders. Creating status that sends the signal to others about who we are and what we represent. Marketers no longer use simple demographics like age, race, ethnicity, gender, marital status, income, education, and employment. Today, marketing is done using psychographics to put pressure on our wants, desires, and dreams. The most famous example was in 2012 when Target had perfected its technique of analyzing consumers’ shopping habits so well that they could figure out who was pregnant before the customers even knew and were sending them advertisements to prepare for a baby. 

A race to the bottom

Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis was the first to use the phrase “race to the bottom” to describe how American states would compromise their values to attract a corporation. Brandeis said this 100 years ago, in 1933. Today, the problem is even worse. In a race to the bottom, if we don’t do it, someone else will. We treat people as statistics, assign value by profit, and try to quantify happiness. The problem with a race to the bottom is that you might win. We sell out thinking the answer is to do what Walmart and Amazon do. But you can’t. No one can out Walmart Walmart or out Amazon Amazon—why then are we selling out and emulating like corporations?

Thoughts of determinism and fate

Cassius: “The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, but in ourselves, that we are underlings.”

—Julius Caesar, Act I, Scene III

Cassius asserts that the “fault “of “underlings” like himself and Brutus is their own. They have allowed themselves to live at the feet of Caesar, and unless they do something about it, they will die meaningless deaths and be forgotten in time. Like Cassius and Brutus, we, too, are responsible for our actions—all of us. And until we can start taking responsibility for why we are here, we will not get out of this hole.

More importantly, the fate of humanity may already be determined. In four billion years, the Sun will eventually die, which would be the end of society unless we find a way to occupy other planets. By then, that is the end of the story. We live in a tragedy that can’t be escaped. I will buy that if you want to call that fate or determinism. But the cosmic destiny of the gods is just a myth.

What we can choose, however, is to take responsibility again and not just throw our hands up in the air thinking there isn’t anything to do and nothing we do doesn’t matter anyway. The journey is worth taking. That is why we choose to get up in the morning. Life has meaning when we decide it does.

Bending the arc of justice

The cruelty and evil displayed during the early days of the United States are perhaps unmatched in any period in human history. Slaves were indoctrinated that they were born inferior. It was even preached that it was part of God’s plan. Apostle Paul’s epistle to the Ephesians (King James Version, which is what was used at the time), “Servants, be obedient to them that are your masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in the sincerity of your heart, as to Christ.” There are plenty of other passages that God-sanctioned this type of behavior that justified the behavior of slave owners. 

In 1828, Federick Bailey was born into the world of slavery with no legal rights or protections. He was separated from his mother during his infancy and sent to his grandparents. His father was a white man who may have been his mother’s slave owner. At six, he was separated from his grandparents and was sent to a plantation. Bailey was then sent to Captain Hugh Auld and his wife Sophia at ten. Bailey felt fortunate when he was sent to work in the home. In the home, Bailey began interacting with books and letters and discovered “the mystery” of reading. Bailey made the connection that the lines of the page correlated with the sounds people were making. Bailey began studying Webster’s Spelling Book. He memorized the alphabet but struggled to understand the sounds made to the letters. Bailey broke down and finally asked Sophia Auld to help him. At the time, slaves were prohibited from learning to read. Whether it was ignorance or empathy, Auld agreed to teach young Bailey. When Captain Auld discovered what had happened, outraged, he ordered it to stop immediately. Captain Auld explained to Sophia in the company of Bailey:

“A nigger should know nothing but to obey his master—to do as he is told to do. Learning would spoil the best nigger in the world. Now, if you teach that nigger how to read, there would be no keeping him. It would forever unfit him to be a slave.”

Bailey later recounted, “I now understood…the white man’s power to enslave the black man. From that moment, I understood the pathway from slavery to freedom.” It’s important to note that in 1860, it was estimated that 5% of African Americans could read and write. By 1890, it was 39%. It wasn’t until 1969 that literacy grew to 96%.

Without Sophia’s help, Bailey continued to find ways to teach himself how to read and then taught other slaves. Bailey wrote, “Their minds had been starved…They had been shut up in mental darkness. I taught them, because it was the delight of my soul.”

(I cried reading that passage the first time. It is so beautiful.)

Bailey eventually escaped and fled to New England, where slavery was illegal. He then changed his name to Frederick Douglas and became a social reformer, abolitionist, orator, writer, statesman, and the most important civil rights movement leader during the 19th century. 

It is easy to forget almost all of human history; we lacked tools for reading and writing. Books are a modern invention. And it wasn’t until the printing press was invented that we mass-produced them. That was just 500 years ago. With access to literature, all things are possible in the pursuit toward dignity and equity.

Pandora’s jar

In Greek mythology, when Prometheus stole fire from heaven, Zeus took it personally and exacted his revenge by gifting a jar called Pandora to Epimetheus, Prometheus’ brother. When Epimetheus opened the jar, out flew into the world all the sickness, death, plagues, pestilence, and evils you can imagine. Though she hastened to close the container, only one thing was left behind – usually translated as Hope. Sometimes, however, hope has been translated to a more pessimistic meaning of “deceptive expectation.” Today, we use the idiom of opening “Pandora’s box” as a warning when starting something that will cause many unforeseen problems.

 No matter how hard we try, we can’t possibly put the knowledge of what we know about the universe back into the box. What’s left is for us to decide whether that hope is left in Pandora’s box or is that deceptive expectation. What is your point of view? 

Parachute effect

I have been fascinated by this idea of being dropped in chaos. So much of the culture we have built has come in the last 200 years, and today, we reinforce it while simultaneously making decisions that affect those who will go next. It’s an interesting idea to live with past choices and have the power to make positive changes for the future.

No one decided to move from hunter-gathers to farming and then to industrialism. And yet, we collectively did. No responsibility, and yet we are all responsible.

I am calling this the parachute effect since we are born into the current chaos of things. 150 years ago, 85% of the workforce were farmers. Today, it is only 4%. We are all products of the time.

BS Jobs

The Bullshit Job, as David Graeber has defined it, is a job so pointless that the person doing it believes it shouldn’t exist, and at the same time, you can’t admit it out loud to anyone.

This is such a fascinating idea to point out. We have been brainwashed since the rise of industrialism that work is part of what it means to be productive. But how much of our jobs are we doing productive work? Most of us who sit in front of a computer can admit that we are not always productive. And so can the person operating a shovel. Because humans are not machines and need breaks. We need purpose and meaning. Sometimes we do boring work, but boring work is not the same as unproductive work.

Something to think about.

First iterations of school

Once clocks were invented, our time was no longer ours. It is someone else’s. We call it “free time” when we are off the clock for a reason. Believe it or not, the early Greek word “scole” or “skole” meant “leisure.” It led to the Latin word “scola” and the English word “school” or “scholar”—thus implying a close connection between leisure and education. Which is vastly different than what we think school should accomplish today.

Influencers

We should ask why this person’s platform is as big as it is. Because there are those out there with something important to say and others with popularity who think that what they say is important.

Famous voices are not necessarily the ones we need to listen to.

Too many of us are embarrassed to admit we listen to people who shouldn’t have the stage to begin with.